Today was an unexpected holiday. Of those that you are almost by surprise, as a result of which the council has had to relocate parties in their original dates coincided with holidays. And you find that you do not know what to do.
Not me, of course, but for my wife. And I said, you want to go to the movies? - Okay, so let's go.
And then came what to choose what to see. It was a long time since we were not going to the movies and I really do not know what could be more interesting movie. Perhaps influenced by the recent Oscars, is, I looked among them had received a statuette, but do not usually go by this kind of approach, where previously we had major disappointments.
We finally settled on a film nominated for four Oscars, but has not received any. We trusted too much, why reading the review, we Dramon tremebundo sounded.
But, surprise! The film, despite being low cost, is performed superbly, with excellent photography and execution of plans that include and soberly dramatize the strength of the scenes.
The actors are superb, both Annette Bening and Julianne Moore in their respective roles of mother and lesbian mother, parent of two teenagers - Mia Wasikovska and Josh Hutcherson - born after artificial insemination paths generated from a single sperm donor, Mark Ruffalo.
With these ingredients could have been concocting a story that easily fall in squalor or histrionica overacting. But no.
One issue, that of families of same-sex marriages, even conflicting fit into society, is treated with great delicacy and naturalness.
much that you get in nature rather skeptical about this issue, see with different eyes. Another issue is that in the end the history of infidelity, the protagonists could have any say traditional couples.
recommended film to watch and reminded me of a conversation heard in Radio days ago. An announcer offered him an imminent viewer pay half the price of admission to the nearest multiplex, if I went to see a English film. The viewer said he still preferred to go to see an American movie, the quality that no doubt find in this nationality. This is surely an exaggeration to comment, but it partly right.
English cinema, heavily subsidized, is committed to the deep-sea movies very dramatic and far-reaching, if not grotesque, type Torrente. But he has the ability to tell stories Quotidiano with the strength and the pulse necessary to attract viewers.
Hence the low interest and low box office revenue. Indeed, if these subsidies are paid with money from the taxpayers' (and therefore I have also contributed to them) should not be either downloaded from the Internet crime films made by such subsidies. Right?